Bible Word-Count Analysis Vol I: Christian-Jewish Syncretic Worldview Part A

What is a Worldview?

A worldview is the fundamental cognitive orientation of an individual or society encompassing the whole of the individual's or society's knowledge and point of view. It can include natural philosophy (inspired from mythology, religion, legend, folklore); fundamental, existential, and normative postulates; or themes, values, emotions, and ethics.

Let's take a look at this radar graph, which is charted by size and volume, not relation of centricity . The purple 'heart' outline represents the total Christian worldview, made up up the blue (largest) and green (smallest) combined. In terms of size and volume, which color heart  represents Christianity, and which makes up Judaism worldview inspiration and inspiration philosophy (A. Green or B. Blue)?

Img1

(Remember your answer for later)

What Is The Foundation of the Christian Worldview?

The Bible, often the 'Holy Bible,' is the primary reference for modern Christianity which contains:

1. The Old Testament Segments of Jewish mythology (e.g. Hebrew Bible, Tanakh etc.) for Christians comissioned by Jewish financiers and formulated for Christians by Italian scholars. These first bibles in history, the Gutenberg Bible, originally had only what is now called the 'OT' and was 'gifted' to the Roman Catholic Church in 1475.

2. The New Testament - Literature on the Church's object, Christ, formulated as a response to the Gutenberg Bible. The Novum Instrumentum was commissioned by the Roman Catholic Church in 1500, formulated by Italian theologians, and first printed in 1516 by the Froben Press in Switzerland. It was called the 'Novum Testamentum' in 1519 and changed again in 1535 to the New 'Testament' years after both books were combined and printed under the same cover.

Bible Word Count Analysis

Img2

As you can see, the OT (i.e. Jewish) worldview (i.e. textual philosophy) is actually overrepresented by 237%! Yes, there is 237% more Jewish literature than Christian literature in the Christian bible.

The Catholic bible has more literature due to it including the Apocrypha deuterocanonical books (seven Old Testament books not found in other bibles). Therefore, the Catholic Bible actually presents an even more predominantly Jewish worldview than the King James or American Revised versions.

Recall your answer from before--Green or Blue? 

With the full view of the chart 1, Green and Blue actually represent the NT and OT wordcount charted from table 1. 

Img3

If it were filled in, the 'blue' would obviously overshadow the 'green,' demonstrating that the Bible presents a predominantly Jewish worldview.

The Biblical Doctrine is Christian-Judaic Syncretism

Syncretism is the combining of different beliefs and various schools of thought. Syncretism involves the merging or assimilation of several mythologies or religions, thus asserting an underlying unity and allowing for an inclusive approach to other faiths.

Modern Christianity is very similar Messianic Judaism, modern syncretic Christian religious movement that incorporates some elements of Judaism and Jewish tradition with Evangelical Christianity. Christians get their worldview from reading Jewish literature (e.g. Old Testament) then wash it down with Christian literature based on Jewish literature (e.g. New Testament).

Further evidence of this is the last and 4th gospel of the NT, John, written to create a link between the OT and NT. In this uniqure gospel, Christ is exhaulted as the 'King of the Jews' who is promoting the 'commandments' of the OT. The KJV was created and dedicated to King James I of England in 1611 by Lancelot Andrewes, an English theologian who selected other theologians to help create the so-called Authorized Version.

Thanks for reading and there will be more parts so subscribe via email!

Sources: Wordcounter, The Historical Origin of Islam, Wikipedia

There's Never Been An 'Ancient Israel' - Stop Lying on Africa!

Some people are mistranslating (purposely or not) the words of the ancient Nile Valley Africans. Theologically-based pseudo-linguistics only supports Zionism (Terrorism) and Racism (White Supremacy). The following excerpts from a scholarly article should help non-linguists understand the pseudo-history that Zionists and other apologists have falsified using the legitimate greatness of KMT (Egypt):
The name Jezreel meaning ‘El sows’ is the name of the fertile valley in the region of Kanaana which is referenced on the Mer en Ptah stela. This is an ancient title of an ancient land that predates the fictional account of a fictional people called the 'children of Israel.'
The proper translation of the above line from the Mer en Ptah Stele is Isiraar or Yisiraar – Jezreel . Jezreel or Yezreel was the lush, fertile valley where l sowed his seed . This goes back to ancient times, prior to the biblical fiction. Those who read the medutu have always known that Isiraar (eeh-seeh-r-aar) spelled Zirin (see-reehn) in arabic did not spell out ‘Israel’ It was a political ploy by the whites and their offspring to promote the false idea that Yezreel/Jezreel on the stela was ‘Israel’, for outside of the bible, there has never been an ancient inscription found spelling out the name Israel. (Full article)
Here's more from Pr Ntr Research:
This can't be 'Isreal' because The Mdw Ntr has no vowels -- /i/ is a vowel
Correct Transliterations:
IPA = jjzjjrjA (all consonants and NO vowels)
MDc = ysyriA
**Special thanks: Kwesi Akhan and Neter Neb

Passover - The Jewish Genocidal Lie

PASSOVER - a holiday commemorating the genocide of Egyptians (Nile-Valley Africans) celebrated by racist Europeans (and their subjects) following Judaism. These people, nicknamed 'Jews,' convinced the unlearned to believe their lineage comes from characters in the Hebrew Bible *(see 'Eponymous' post). Besides genocide by 'God,' the most absurd element to Passover or Pesach is that these biblical tales aren't based on historical realities--ancient Jews (Hebrews/Israelites) only exist in narrative fairytales.

The Bible is an allegorical text--a spiritual reference, not a historical one! Abrahamic texts never list the 3-5 names of "Pharoahs" (which is hardly even a name), last names of characters, and of course, dates! Giving this type of detail would instigate cross-referencing these lies with legitimate historical records--there aren't any authentic historical records of a Moses, Abraham, Jacob, Isaac etc.
Most histories of ancient Israel no longer consider information about the Egyptian sojourn, the exodus, and the wilderness wanderings recoverable or even relevant to Israel's emergence...Most important is the fact that no clear extrabiblical evidence exists for any aspect of the Egyptian sojourn, exodus or wilderness wanderings - (pp 81, Biblical History and Israel's Past, by Moore and Kelle, 2011)
The reason 'Egypt' is the most used word in the Bible is because its legitimate greatness (world's first alphabet, advanced architecture, science, mathematics etc.) provides an anchor to all of the fictitious ahistorical civilizations (Judea, Mesopotamia, Babylonia, Sumeria, Persia) which only exist in the minds of believers and the mouths of liars.

*Even if the "real Jews" are Black or "Middle Eastern," it still doesn't make the mythology reality. For example, whether the tooth fairy was Black, Green, Red, Purple makes no difference.

**Special Thanks: Jabari Osaze